A point i often make is those now CONFIRMED to be harmed (to the point of death) from the lockdown policies (namely those with dementia) died the most 'involving' COVID-19 from March-June 2020 and there was no COVID testing taking place in care homes. Where is the proof these people died from a novel disease?
Yes a concise and important article highlighting the fraudulent methods they used , similar in England, the death data was carefully manipulated to hide the real reasons for the spike in deaths during lockdown which was 'harvesting' (culling) by the regime using various methods from not helping or treating people for conditions like heart attacks/cancer to actively murdering people using neglect and isolation, quaccines, midazolam, ventilators and psychological warfare which also led to many suicides Inc of children.
This is an excellent piece which must have taken a huge amount of time to research and produce, thank you. I’m concerned about the definition of Covid-19 which was and is still used to terrify people into compliance with lockdowns, jabs etc. (Bearing in mind that ‘Covid-19’, whatever it is, was downgraded by the WHO as a high consequence disease in March 2020. ) I understand Covid-19 as a relatively rare but serious consequence arising from SARS-CoV-2 infection, similar to the potentially serious consequences of flu for those who are frail and/or already unwell. Might it be more accurate to refer to SARS-CoV-2 as the source of infection/deaths instead of Covid-19 which was/is no concern for the majority of people. And might we be perpetuating the Covid myth by failing to make this correction?
For anyone who is just starting to question the whole ‘covid’ narrative here are a few more things worth noting (and verifying for yourself of course).
Be warned, pulling at these threads will cause the whole thing to unravel!
More than a century of real world experiments (over 200) have failed to validate the theory of contagion. When healthy volunteers have been exposed to sick people and even been smeared with their snot and lung fluids they have not gotten sick. The theory of contagion remains unproven at best, and after 200 experiments it’s safe to say it is a DIS-proven theory. According to the science, colds and flus are no more contagious than scurvy - a disease which was also once considered to be highly contagious (it seemed self evident to everybody at the time). You can read about the contagion studies in Daniel Roytas’ recent book ‘Can You Catch a Cold?’, or listen to his interviews on rumble, odysee etc for free.
The field of virology has been debunked on its own terms using its own control experiments. The latest round of controls have been performed by Jaime Andrews’ Virology Controls Studies Project (find him on substack - all content is free). These experiments replicate the standard virology cell culture experiments which are the industry standard to ‘prove’ a virus, but in this case WITHOUT adding any purported ‘viral sample’ to the culture (hence ‘control’). Despite being sterile the cell cultures still yielded the exact same proofs of a ‘virus’ (CPE and electron microscopy images of so called ‘viral’ particles). These results prove the cell cultures themselves will yield so called ‘viruses’ whether a sample is added to them or not. This invalidates all claims made by virologists (because virology fails the most basic criteria for science which is falsifiability). Everything downstream from virology must therefore also be considered invalid too (the science of vaccines, viral disease, pandemics - all of it).
The model for ‘viral contagion’ which was used to inform government policy (ie lockdowns) at the start of 2020 was based on a 2017 experiment by the BBC, Cambridge Uni and LSHTM which simulated a ‘viral pandemic’ in the UK with the help of 30,000 volunteers from the public. Dr Hannah Fry presented the experiment which was also made into a TV show (‘Contagion! The BBC4 Pandemic’). She also acted as ‘patient zero’ (whatever that means) and supposedly spread a ‘virus’ to the volunteers at a meet up in the town of Haslemere, Surrey. Unlike the previous century of contagion experiments (see point 1), this experiment involved no biology whatsoever and was conducted entirely in the digital realm. The volunteers all downloaded a specially commissioned smartphone app and a ‘digital pathogen’ (whatever that means) was spread between the smartphones through the use of GPS tracking (basically track and trace). The data gathered from this experiment became (in their own words) ‘the new gold standard’ for pandemic modelling. So after a century of failed contagion experiments involving real sick people and their snot, the 2020 lockdown policies were based on an experiment conducted three years earlier, involving 30,000 smartphones apps and a ‘digital virus’. Coincidently, the first official case of ‘viral transmission’ within the UK in 2020 also occurred in Haslemere, almost as if the 2020 pandemic was replicating the 2017 experiment but being passed off as a ‘real’ pandemic this time.
Me too. Like a lot of people I (more or less) accepted the germ theory model by default at the start of 2020. I had no idea it was even in dispute. It took about a year before I was confident that it was pseudoscience (and I'm very open minded), so I have sympathy for people who struggle with the concept.
I now realise even Florence Nightingale argued that germ theory and the drug industry was essentially a scam 150 years ago. I now see germ theory as the radical and kooky position which requires all sorts of mental gymnastics and dodgy science to keep it propped up.
One silver lining of 'covid' is it's opened up this whole pandora's box and got everyone discussing the topic again.
But dismantling the official narrative ON ITS OWN TERMS (as you have done in this video) is just as important and valuable work, because a lot of people are not ready to question the entire disease paradigm all at once.
They really did try and think of every eventually in case the public decided, as they had done with swine flu a decade earlier, that there was nothing to fear and simply didn't play along.
It's remarkable how completely successful this hoax was.
Truly a worldwide first and yet - killing doesn't appear to be the primary objective...
After the first nine week 'Lockdown' you say, quote: "Logic would have you believe that opening back up would result in the virus spreading once again."
I don't agree.
The "Logic" would suggest quite the opposite in fact. That warm May, June, July, August and September weather is precisely the reason why seasonal influenza vanishes.
Secondly, the first graph seems to suggest very strongly that the virus wasn't DEADLY. The 'Lockdown' was. And the subsequent flu and COVID vaccinations were.
So, again "Logic" would dictate that there was little to fear from the coronavirus and EVERYTHING to fear about State imposed sanctions, emergency hogwash 'rules' and the untested, clearly dangerous mass injections.
This is what "Logic" dictates.
Fear was deliberately pumped into the world, rather than any tangible disease or actual virus.
And the recorded deaths together with the fabricated "test cases" fuelled this invented fear - until the arrival of the "cure". A deadly vaccine. Which kept the whole sick show on the road for another 12 to 24 months depending where you were in the world.
"Logic" dictates that the general public are very gullible. That they believed in a "virus story" that existed in their minds WITHOUT A SHRED OF CREDIBLE EVIDENCE.
That's what logic says.
And the rest of your detailed and frankly shocking article proves this
was a huge hoax, played upon the public to criminally coerce as many as possible into accepting the jabs in their arms.
Most people complied because they believed the story completely.
Some for "convenience's sake." To literally go on holiday or to return to work etc.
A few died, immediately or within the fourteen days, or the months between injections (not technically vaccinated, remember?) and these deaths were thrown on the bonfire like fuel to the flames! These murders used to support the lie of deadly infectious disease - IT WAS PURE EVIL.
Many more than a few are still suffering and STILL dying today, five years on.
"Logic" says that the recent sudden adult death syndrome is connected to the injections. Either to the contents of those rushed vaccines, or to the administering of them: not aspirating the syringes, dirty needles, mistakes by amateurs etc etc.
Our problem has ALWAYS been that "Logic" played no role in the criminal lie that was covid.
And so, I don't see any point in abusing logic, by asking about a virus that remains a complete mystery and clearly wasn't deadly, when today we are left looking back on the crimes committed "for our health and safety."
Superb analysis. Definitive.
A point i often make is those now CONFIRMED to be harmed (to the point of death) from the lockdown policies (namely those with dementia) died the most 'involving' COVID-19 from March-June 2020 and there was no COVID testing taking place in care homes. Where is the proof these people died from a novel disease?
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/breakingscottish-covid-inquiry-closing?utm_source=publication-search
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newcovid-deaths-at-the-scottish-covid
Nick Phin was also back at UK COVID inquiry 6 Nov 2024 stating the following as have several care home managers from the Scottish inquiry:
''Many of the people who actually developed COVID had many comorbidities and it may have been another cause that eventually led to their death.’’
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/breakinguk-covid-19-inquiry-6-nov?utm_source=publication-search
There is also a very good reason this has not been reported by any media in the world.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
Yes a concise and important article highlighting the fraudulent methods they used , similar in England, the death data was carefully manipulated to hide the real reasons for the spike in deaths during lockdown which was 'harvesting' (culling) by the regime using various methods from not helping or treating people for conditions like heart attacks/cancer to actively murdering people using neglect and isolation, quaccines, midazolam, ventilators and psychological warfare which also led to many suicides Inc of children.
All those people left or induced to die for a lie, and few seem to care.
This is an excellent piece which must have taken a huge amount of time to research and produce, thank you. I’m concerned about the definition of Covid-19 which was and is still used to terrify people into compliance with lockdowns, jabs etc. (Bearing in mind that ‘Covid-19’, whatever it is, was downgraded by the WHO as a high consequence disease in March 2020. ) I understand Covid-19 as a relatively rare but serious consequence arising from SARS-CoV-2 infection, similar to the potentially serious consequences of flu for those who are frail and/or already unwell. Might it be more accurate to refer to SARS-CoV-2 as the source of infection/deaths instead of Covid-19 which was/is no concern for the majority of people. And might we be perpetuating the Covid myth by failing to make this correction?
Thank you Valerie
I totally get the point - and is why I often write ‘COVID’ in quote marks
Whether is existed or now, whether viruses are real or not, one thing is sure. There was HEAVY misattribution of death along the way
Top notch analysis. Well done.
For anyone who is just starting to question the whole ‘covid’ narrative here are a few more things worth noting (and verifying for yourself of course).
Be warned, pulling at these threads will cause the whole thing to unravel!
More than a century of real world experiments (over 200) have failed to validate the theory of contagion. When healthy volunteers have been exposed to sick people and even been smeared with their snot and lung fluids they have not gotten sick. The theory of contagion remains unproven at best, and after 200 experiments it’s safe to say it is a DIS-proven theory. According to the science, colds and flus are no more contagious than scurvy - a disease which was also once considered to be highly contagious (it seemed self evident to everybody at the time). You can read about the contagion studies in Daniel Roytas’ recent book ‘Can You Catch a Cold?’, or listen to his interviews on rumble, odysee etc for free.
The field of virology has been debunked on its own terms using its own control experiments. The latest round of controls have been performed by Jaime Andrews’ Virology Controls Studies Project (find him on substack - all content is free). These experiments replicate the standard virology cell culture experiments which are the industry standard to ‘prove’ a virus, but in this case WITHOUT adding any purported ‘viral sample’ to the culture (hence ‘control’). Despite being sterile the cell cultures still yielded the exact same proofs of a ‘virus’ (CPE and electron microscopy images of so called ‘viral’ particles). These results prove the cell cultures themselves will yield so called ‘viruses’ whether a sample is added to them or not. This invalidates all claims made by virologists (because virology fails the most basic criteria for science which is falsifiability). Everything downstream from virology must therefore also be considered invalid too (the science of vaccines, viral disease, pandemics - all of it).
The model for ‘viral contagion’ which was used to inform government policy (ie lockdowns) at the start of 2020 was based on a 2017 experiment by the BBC, Cambridge Uni and LSHTM which simulated a ‘viral pandemic’ in the UK with the help of 30,000 volunteers from the public. Dr Hannah Fry presented the experiment which was also made into a TV show (‘Contagion! The BBC4 Pandemic’). She also acted as ‘patient zero’ (whatever that means) and supposedly spread a ‘virus’ to the volunteers at a meet up in the town of Haslemere, Surrey. Unlike the previous century of contagion experiments (see point 1), this experiment involved no biology whatsoever and was conducted entirely in the digital realm. The volunteers all downloaded a specially commissioned smartphone app and a ‘digital pathogen’ (whatever that means) was spread between the smartphones through the use of GPS tracking (basically track and trace). The data gathered from this experiment became (in their own words) ‘the new gold standard’ for pandemic modelling. So after a century of failed contagion experiments involving real sick people and their snot, the 2020 lockdown policies were based on an experiment conducted three years earlier, involving 30,000 smartphones apps and a ‘digital virus’. Coincidently, the first official case of ‘viral transmission’ within the UK in 2020 also occurred in Haslemere, almost as if the 2020 pandemic was replicating the 2017 experiment but being passed off as a ‘real’ pandemic this time.
https://odysee.com/@CoronaStudies:3/SMART-HEIST:7
The further we went into the ‘pandemic’ the more accepting I became of terrain theory over germ theory …..
Me too. Like a lot of people I (more or less) accepted the germ theory model by default at the start of 2020. I had no idea it was even in dispute. It took about a year before I was confident that it was pseudoscience (and I'm very open minded), so I have sympathy for people who struggle with the concept.
I now realise even Florence Nightingale argued that germ theory and the drug industry was essentially a scam 150 years ago. I now see germ theory as the radical and kooky position which requires all sorts of mental gymnastics and dodgy science to keep it propped up.
One silver lining of 'covid' is it's opened up this whole pandora's box and got everyone discussing the topic again.
But dismantling the official narrative ON ITS OWN TERMS (as you have done in this video) is just as important and valuable work, because a lot of people are not ready to question the entire disease paradigm all at once.
Anyway great work!
Do you support the below?:
Real Cause of Seasonal Flu & Pandemics
Detox Triggered by EMF, Toxic Injections, and Environmental Toxins
https://open.substack.com/pub/talknet/p/real-cause-of-seasonal-flu-and-pandemics?r=100zv1&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
Asymptomatic spread requires no snot.
They really did try and think of every eventually in case the public decided, as they had done with swine flu a decade earlier, that there was nothing to fear and simply didn't play along.
It's remarkable how completely successful this hoax was.
Truly a worldwide first and yet - killing doesn't appear to be the primary objective...
Great work. Even after this time it's still shocking to see laid bare what went on. What's even more shameful is no one has been held accountable.
I wanted to leave a record of all the facts. Going to do same for 2021, 2022, 2023
And might do England at some point
Want it all out my hand and wrapped in a bow
Excellent work. Added to my digital archives.
https://webarchive.nrscotland.gov.uk/20210915184442/https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/statistics/statistics-by-theme/vital-events/general-publications/weekly-and-monthly-data-on-births-and-deaths/deaths-involving-coronavirus-covid-19-in-scotland
https://webarchive.nrscotland.gov.uk/20210915184647/https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/statistics/statistics-by-theme/vital-events/general-publications/weekly-and-monthly-data-on-births-and-deaths/deaths-involving-coronavirus-covid-19-in-scotland/archive
After the first nine week 'Lockdown' you say, quote: "Logic would have you believe that opening back up would result in the virus spreading once again."
I don't agree.
The "Logic" would suggest quite the opposite in fact. That warm May, June, July, August and September weather is precisely the reason why seasonal influenza vanishes.
Secondly, the first graph seems to suggest very strongly that the virus wasn't DEADLY. The 'Lockdown' was. And the subsequent flu and COVID vaccinations were.
So, again "Logic" would dictate that there was little to fear from the coronavirus and EVERYTHING to fear about State imposed sanctions, emergency hogwash 'rules' and the untested, clearly dangerous mass injections.
This is what "Logic" dictates.
Fear was deliberately pumped into the world, rather than any tangible disease or actual virus.
And the recorded deaths together with the fabricated "test cases" fuelled this invented fear - until the arrival of the "cure". A deadly vaccine. Which kept the whole sick show on the road for another 12 to 24 months depending where you were in the world.
"Logic" dictates that the general public are very gullible. That they believed in a "virus story" that existed in their minds WITHOUT A SHRED OF CREDIBLE EVIDENCE.
That's what logic says.
And the rest of your detailed and frankly shocking article proves this
was a huge hoax, played upon the public to criminally coerce as many as possible into accepting the jabs in their arms.
Most people complied because they believed the story completely.
Some for "convenience's sake." To literally go on holiday or to return to work etc.
A few died, immediately or within the fourteen days, or the months between injections (not technically vaccinated, remember?) and these deaths were thrown on the bonfire like fuel to the flames! These murders used to support the lie of deadly infectious disease - IT WAS PURE EVIL.
Many more than a few are still suffering and STILL dying today, five years on.
"Logic" says that the recent sudden adult death syndrome is connected to the injections. Either to the contents of those rushed vaccines, or to the administering of them: not aspirating the syringes, dirty needles, mistakes by amateurs etc etc.
Our problem has ALWAYS been that "Logic" played no role in the criminal lie that was covid.
And so, I don't see any point in abusing logic, by asking about a virus that remains a complete mystery and clearly wasn't deadly, when today we are left looking back on the crimes committed "for our health and safety."
Thank you for your otherwise excellent article.
NEVER forget NEVER again.
there was NO pandemic
‘Pandemic’ …..
Forgot to add my link to an article I wrote in 2022 on how they manipulated the death data and coding in UK/USA with Palantir running the NHS data dashboards ICD coding manipulation and death certificate alteration rules amongst other methods https://open.substack.com/pub/callystarforth/p/is-ai-misleading-us-by-design?r=1eq51l&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false